“Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information on it.”
– Samuel Johnson.
Photo: Rafael Rex Felisilda, Unsplash
Determining the best ways to maximise societal impact is challenging for universities that are operating with constrained resources in increasingly dynamic environments. It calls for strong decisions based on reliable information that has been garnered astutely and efficiently.
Universities seeking to maximise societal impact invariably must have an outward focus on major societal needs, and must shape education programs and research outcomes, together with partners, to address those needs.
As a result, universities are presented with many different reasons to ‘engage’. These include garnering market intelligence and insights, building relationships and networks, creating buy-in through shared vision, fostering active support from key stakeholders, structuring flexible and sustainable partnerships, and working with partners to ensure the most people in need have access to programs, products and services.
This diversity of reasons, coupled with the breadth of activities across a university, can make the nature and scope of engagement seem astonishingly complex, and can lead to disparate activities that are often ineffectual or dilutive.
How can universities direct their engagement activities purposefully so their efforts are effective, productive, and likely to result in the delivery of great socio-economic benefit? How does a university design an effective engagement model?
These important questions require considered investigation.
The answers are found by first determining purposeful engagement activities and then coupling them with supporting internal and external channels for engagement. And the frameworks introduced in earlier blogs provide the keys to unlocking the conundrum!
Purposeful Engagement
There are three simple but key steps required to advance from directionless to purposeful engagement.
Step one: Appreciate the overarching objective of engagement from the outset. Is the major objective to: (1) set organisational direction (viz., determine what we will do); (2) curate opportunities; (3) shape partnerships, or (4) work with partners to deliver outcomes?
Step two: Recognise the purpose of engaging for each distinct objective. For example, the purpose to engage when the objective is to set organisational direction is to 'inform' (lots about this in previous blogs). The purpose to engage when the objective is to curate opportunities, is to 'enlist' (viz., source and design offerings to facilitate uptake and utilisation). The purpose to engage when the objective is to shape partnerships, is to 'structure' (viz., shape mutually beneficial and enduring partnerships). And when the objective is to deliver outcomes, the purpose of engaging is to 'perform' (viz., maximise the delivery of socio-economic benefits).
Step three: Focus engagement activities based on the purpose for engaging. For example, the purpose to engage when the objective is to curate opportunities is to 'enlist'. To enlist, internal engagement activities focus on orienting and deploying resources to provide solutions (viz., ‘activating’). External engagement activities focus on identifying and articulating the problem to be solved (viz., ‘understanding’). For example, when the objective is to shape partnerships, the purpose of engaging is to 'structure'. To structure, internal engagement activities are focused on determining university approaches to solving problems, identifying the best combination of resources required to solve problems, assembling offerings and determining the appropriate partnership terms ('craft'). External engagement activities involve exploring ways to work together, identifying and selecting the best partners, shaping and justifying offerings and shaping partnerships ('attract'). For example, when the objective is to deliver outcomes, the purpose of engaging is to ensure stakeholders 'perform'. Here, internal engagement activities focus on 'managing' and external engagement activities on 'leveraging' outcomes.
By clarifying objectives and recognising the associated purposes to engage, a matrix of focused engagement activities can be developed. Hopefully, you are getting the gist. If you are, you’ve noticed that three very important principles underpin the approach to engaging purposefully.
First, when the objective is clear and the purpose determined, the questions to be answered become evident as do the engagement activities required to answer them. This helps maximise outcomes from a given resource envelope. Or to put it another way, it helps to stop wasting time and effort on (and developing that caffeine addiction from!) directionless and meaningless meetings.
Second, for each objective and matching purpose, the (now) focused internal and external engagement activities must operate in tandem. The questions to be answered require interrogation of both internal and external environments.
And, as a final takeaway, once you obtain an understanding of how to engage purposefully, the requisite internal and external engagement channels can be resourcefully established and utilised to achieve great outcomes.
If you would like to know more about establishing a great engagement model, involving an understanding of purposeful engagement and the requisite internal and external engagement channels to build and utilise, please refer to my book The University Imperative – Delivering Socio-economic Benefits for our World.
There are some really insightful concepts and examples detailed throughout.
For others who see the value in the concepts the book provides, but would like to know a little more, look out for forthcoming blogs about building a matching operating model and implementation model. These blogs help bring together all requisite activities needed to deliver great socio-economic benefits. We need universities (indeed all organisations), and their partners and collaborators, to deliver socio-economic benefits for our world.
I hope the book will help. A lot!
Please recommend the blogs and book to others.
We need as many people as possible on board, contributing to improving the world in which we live.
I look forward to our continued journey.
Nick & The University Imperative team.
“What was happening could be described as a great ship being turned and blunted and shoved about and pulled around by many small tugs. Once turned by tide and tugs, it must set a new course and start its engines turning. On the bridge which is the planning centre, the question must be asked: All right, I know now where I want to go. How do I get there, and where are the lurking rocks and what will the weather be?”
– John Steinbeck, The Winter of our Discontent, Pan Books, 1961, p. 98
Ever since their establishment as institutions of higher education and research, universities have been different. Their evolution across the past ten centuries has seen them infused with an enduring ethos to benefit society. Irrespective of individual institutional personalities and their manifold geographical coordinates, this remains a distinguishing characteristic of any university. A university is still a community of teachers and scholars. It, therefore, remains a veritable epicentre of ideas, a concept factory, the rightful birthplace of innovations and products that make the world a better place in which to live. It is a think-tank for the betterment of society, an environment where the very practice of education is an exercise in social enrichment.
Certainly, that remains the intent.
However, we live today in a world of constant change, uncertainty and unprecedented challenges, a social situation accentuated by the global events of 2020 and 2021. We find ourselves in profoundly difficult territory.
While universities, on the face of it, continue to operate according to their broad traditional ethos, they are increasingly required to question whether they have the societal cut-through expected of institutions of higher education and research. Are the graduates emerging from universities today scholars in the truest sense of the word? Are they the thought leaders and change managers who are capable of not just meeting the demands of an uncertain environment but able and determined to transform it for the greater good? Are the products at the end of the university assembly line utilised in the delivery of social benefit?
Achieving that cut-through and hitting those societal targets is no longer a matter of course. The digital revolution has seen to this. Technologies have changed the ways we think and interact forever, not least in terms of information and know-how and how these are acquired and shared. A new currency is at play in the business of knowledge, and the modern value of higher education and research has come under pressure. The academic foundations and research rigour that once positioned the university on a higher plane are now under siege from easily accessed information (frequently camouflaged as expert knowledge). Multi-national tech companies have provided global platforms for the convenient proliferation of opinion in the absence of verified facts, and these often run counter to university endeavours and principles.
What of society-serving universities and the platforms they provide for scholars and researchers and the products of their academic enterprise? It is a prescient question which has risen ominously as the university funding model has been depleted and dented and ultimately damaged by a turbulent economic landscape, competition and the loss of traditional market-share, and ever tightening public funding available to support university activities.
Yet the need for universities to play their more than noble part in addressing societal issues has never been so clear. The onset of a global pandemic and its implications for health and governance into the future has amplified this need. Unless the role of the university is reinvigorated in proficient fashion, further challenges of profound import lie waiting for the people of this planet. There can be no doubt that the university – the institution of higher education and research, the community of teachers and scholars – is the entity best placed to meet these challenges. Society needs universities to stay relevant and provide benefit for all their stakeholders.
But staying relevant in a world of change requires change. And while a new or renewed way forward must be forged, it is incumbent on any university not only to do the right things, but to do them right. Staying relevant requires intent, focus, proficiencies, and organisational character. It means shaking off moribund shackles of intellectual isolation, and re-engineering the university mechanisms to harness the knowledge and energies of educators and researchers determined to flourish in the face of exponential change and challenges.
At the same time, the benefits of the educator’s and researcher’s work must accrue to the largest social cohort; otherwise a university will not achieve its mission and its relevance wanes. Educators and researchers must be provided with the platforms to nurture their sense of opportunity so it reaches tangibly beyond campus boundaries and seeks out collaborations that can optimise the impact of their work on a broad and meaningful scale.
The aim of The University Imperative is to present universities of all shapes and sizes around the world with a sense of what is required in this climate. It constructs a framework with which they can confidently calibrate their operations. The enduring goal of the university has not changed; delivering a beneficial impact for society remains the order of the day. What has changed is the emergent need for business disciplines in the delivery of social benefits.
Across ten chapters The University Imperative constructs a conceptual scaffold which considers the university’s bearings in this hectic social space while also keeping a measured eye on the resources at a university’s disposal. Any inclination to plot a way forward using rankings and recruitment like GPS coordinates must be resisted. Rather, the abiding importance of tertiary education and research must be reasserted, perhaps recalibrated, so that these staples of university can deliver the graduate and research outcomes that make our new world of perpetual flux a better place for all.
A university is an epicentre of ideas, a concept factory, the rightful birthplace of innovations and products that make the world a better place in which to live. It is a think-tank for the betterment of society an social enrichment.<br>
Yet universities find themselves in profoundly difficult territory, damaged by turbulent economic landscapes, intense competition and strained funding models. Unless the role of the university is reinvigorated in a proficient way, the ability to achieve its mission will be impaired.<br>
And with its mission impaired, relevance declines.
The University Imperative is a book that helps university leadership and management teams navigate today’s dynamic environments. It provides a framework for universities’ decision-makers to confidently attune their operations through identifying steadfast factors that, regardless of rapidly changing and complex environments, they must consider and master to deliver great socio-economic benefits